Speaker
Description
A two-layered analytical approach was applied to assess the influence of actual experience with the state and functioning of procedural justice, trust in leadership, and the level of digitalization of equipment in military formations in a peacetime context on service members’ expectations regarding the performance of strategic, operational, and tactical levels of leadership in the command and control (C2) system during a hypothetical operational scenario. The adopted methodological framework allows for a parallel analysis of the substantive relationships among the included variables while simultaneously accounting for the mental transition between cognitive representations of actual experience and those constructed at the level of abstract hypothesizing.
In conditions of compressed timeframes and escalating complexity, dynamism, and multi-layered operational environments, modern C2 system are conceptualized around the principle of centralized command and decentralized execution, which functions as a system-forming mechanism for maintaining operational tempo and ensuring coordination coherence across different levels of command.
Procedural justice in peacetime and established trust in leadership are recognized as fundamental prerequisites for effective mission command, as they foster perceptions of legitimacy, commitment, and willingness to take initiative at lower levels of command.
Digitalization, including the development of artificial intelligence transforms command into the so-called “digital mission command” (NATO, 2020) emphasizing the achievement of decision superiority. This requires leaders at all levels to interpret and effectively act upon digitally provided information, thereby enabling closer and faster alignment between strategic objectives and tactical actions on the battlefield.
The empirical study was conducted on a representative sample of 1,600 service members and included analysis of data collected through a battery of questionnaires covering psychological and organizational measures.
Correlation and mediation analyses demonstrate that procedural justice, trust in leadership, and digitalization exert systematic and multi-level effects on expectations of leadership effectiveness in C2 systems in the context of real operational scenario. The results indicate that digitalization and trust in leadership enhance command effectiveness through the mediating role of procedural justice, with digitalization exhibiting a stronger mediating effect than trust.